The Empire article starts of by giving a basic outline of the story without giving any spoilers away, it then highlights what sets this film apart from other home invasion films, as the article draws too a close it starts too reveal 'spoilers' but in the context of praising the film. Paragraphs two and three are broken up by a picture and three and four are broken up by the films trailers. The tone of this article is trying too be professional but in my opinion it is a little bit flat, a bog-standard review for a film. This article doesn't inspire me to go see the film, it looks like the writer, Kim Newman, has just followed an instructions manual as the review doesn't have the detail or passion of the Guardian article.
The Guardian review starts off written in first person, relating too the reader, the tone of the review is very down-to-earth but manages to stay professional at the same time. This review is written as though the writer (Jordan Hoffman) has actual passion for writing reviews (The Empire review being the opposite), this review goes into extreme detail on how this film is unique, Jordan explains everything in incredible detail which makes me want to go see the film.
Sight and Sound's writing style is similar too The Guardians, it is professional and keeps the reader entertained and enlightened. The review highlights the key features of the film, expressing their opinion on how it achieved 'Film of the week'. The quantity of detail that Sight and Sound goes into is slightly less than that of The Guardian but manages to match the quality of the detail.
The review starts with four medium-sized paragraphs, followed by an image of two of the characters and then another two medium-sized paragraphs.